PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMW.TO vs. GS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Primo Water Corporation (PRMW.TO) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRMW.TO is traded in CAD, while GS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


PRMW.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GS

1D
-4.74%
1M
13.78%
YTD
21.19%
6M
23.82%
1Y
78.26%
3Y*
52.49%
5Y*
28.17%
10Y*
24.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMW.TO
Primo Water Corporation
0.00%0.00%89.26%-3.47%-4.40%13.08%13.96%-5.42%-8.31%39.84%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
21.19%49.45%65.09%13.35%-1.31%46.28%15.47%33.57%-27.89%0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMW.TO and GS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

PRMW.TO:

CA$0.29

GS:

$57.41

PE Ratio

PRMW.TO:

127.08

GS:

18.09

PEG Ratio

PRMW.TO:

0.17

GS:

2.34

PS Ratio

PRMW.TO:

3.25

GS:

2.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRMW.TO:

CA$4.34B

GS:

$110.77B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRMW.TO:

CA$1.71B

GS:

$61.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRMW.TO:

CA$835.90M

GS:

$24.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMW.TO vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMW.TO

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Primo Water Corporation (PRMW.TO) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMW.TOGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMW.TOGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

Volatility

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMW.TOGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.26%

Dividends

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

PRMW.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.64%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
PRMW.TO
Primo Water Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.72%1.60%1.33%1.08%1.20%1.35%1.26%1.14%2.11%1.57%

Financials

PRMW.TO vs. GS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Primo Water Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
1.73B
17.23B
(PRMW.TO) Total Revenue
(GS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PRMW.TO values in CAD, GS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


PRMW.TO and GS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMW.TO and GS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer