PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMR vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMR vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 26.02% return.


PRMR

1D
-3.37%
1M
3.34%
YTD
7.24%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-4.70%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
26.02%
6M
29.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMR vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRMR and AFOS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMR vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRMR vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMRAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

3.75

-2.69

Drawdowns

PRMR vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMRAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-11.52%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.83%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-1.38%

-1.09%

Volatility

PRMR vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMRAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

20.74%

-6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.04%

20.74%

-6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

20.74%

-6.70%

PRMR vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMR vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

PRMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRMR and AFOS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for PRMR.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for PRMR.

They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMR and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer