PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CP vs. MCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CP vs. MCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than MCO's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CP has underperformed MCO with an annualized return of 12.76%, while MCO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.61% annualized return.


CP

1D
0.83%
1M
1.25%
6M
20.08%
YTD
21.24%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
10.35%

MCO

1D
-0.80%
1M
-2.47%
6M
-6.79%
YTD
-5.93%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
17.61%
ALL TIME*
15.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$233.07M$226.64M$247.01M
$483.34M$433.94M$468.07M

CP vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
21.24%2.60%-7.84%6.85%4.71%4.64%37.33%45.04%-1.81%29.32%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-5.93%8.74%22.17%41.52%-27.80%35.57%23.26%71.26%-4.10%58.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CP and MCO is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between CP and MCO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CP:

$78.14B

MCO:

$82.86B

EPS

CP:

$4.85

MCO:

$15.70

PE Ratio

CP:

18.31

MCO:

30.47

PEG Ratio

CP:

7.69

MCO:

3.98

PS Ratio

CP:

4.91

MCO:

10.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

CP:

$16.44B

MCO:

$8.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CP:

$7.68B

MCO:

$5.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

CP:

$9.05B

MCO:

$4.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CP vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CP
CP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CP vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPMCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

-0.28

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

-0.55

+4.54

CP vs. MCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the MCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP and MCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CP vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum MCO drawdown of -78.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP and MCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.17%

-78.72%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-23.61%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-24.65%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-41.66%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.70%

-42.02%

+8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-10.94%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.24%

-17.73%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

11.79%

-6.28%

Volatility

CP vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) is 6.30%, while Moody's Corporation (MCO) has a volatility of 9.41%. This indicates that CP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

9.41%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

23.32%

-6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

28.03%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

26.71%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

27.79%

-2.30%

Dividends

CP vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison

CP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MCO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
0.77%0.86%0.76%0.78%0.96%0.84%0.76%0.93%1.07%0.92%0.98%0.98%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.82%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%

Financials

CP vs. MCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited and Moody's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CP vs. MCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited and Moody's Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

MCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.67B and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

CP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

MCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moody's Corporation reported an operating income of 1.05B and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.9%.

CP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a net income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.

MCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a net income of 878.00M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CP and MCO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCO has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to CP (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CP dropped -69.17% vs MCO's -78.72%.

CP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CP and MCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer