PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRKZX vs. SDMZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRKZX achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than SDMZX's 1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PRKZX has outperformed SDMZX with an annualized return of 6.02%, while SDMZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.


PRKZX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.58%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.45%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
6.02%

SDMZX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.56%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRKZX
PGIM Real Estate Income Fund
11.67%3.74%17.55%10.54%-16.17%21.17%-8.68%30.19%-10.05%6.55%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.03%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%7.92%0.95%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PRKZX and SDMZX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.24

The correlation between PRKZX and SDMZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRKZX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRKZX
PRKZX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PRKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PRKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRKZXSDMZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.51

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.79

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

11.24

-6.65

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRKZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the SDMZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRKZX and SDMZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRKZX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, which is greater than SDMZX's maximum drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRKZX and SDMZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRKZXSDMZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.95%

-9.76%

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-1.77%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-1.77%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-8.51%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.95%

-9.76%

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.55%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-0.99%

-6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

0.44%

+2.59%

Volatility

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) at 2.48%. This indicates that PRKZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRKZXSDMZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.48%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

2.81%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

3.14%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

2.56%

+11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

2.58%

+14.60%

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRKZX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRKZX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison

PRKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than SDMZX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRKZX
PGIM Real Estate Income Fund
6.69%7.09%8.63%4.25%5.53%29.71%4.27%4.53%5.65%5.18%4.96%0.00%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.70%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRKZX and SDMZX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRKZX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to SDMZX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRKZX dropped -46.95% vs SDMZX's -9.76%.

SDMZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRKZX and SDMZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer