PRKZX vs. HLRRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRKZX (PGIM Real Estate Income Fund) and HLRRX (LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, PRKZX returned 6.06%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for HLRRX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRKZX charges 1.38%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for HLRRX.

Performance

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRKZX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PRKZX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 6.06%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.01% annualized return.

PRKZX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

HLRRX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 6M: 16.52%
• 1Y: 11.49%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund	10.69%	3.74%	17.55%	10.54%	-16.17%	21.17%	-8.68%	30.19%	-10.05%	6.55%
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund	15.25%	-9.13%	9.45%	10.50%	-21.40%	40.50%	-3.78%	31.75%	-13.63%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PRKZX and HLRRX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.87

The correlation between PRKZX and HLRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRKZX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRKZX

PRKZX Risk / Return Rank: 19
PRKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PRKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PRKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PRKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PRKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

HLRRX

HLRRX Risk / Return Rank: 18
HLRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
HLRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HLRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HLRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
HLRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRKZX	HLRRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.00	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	1.43	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.87	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	4.24	-0.04

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRKZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the HLRRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRKZX and HLRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRKZX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, smaller than the maximum HLRRX drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRKZX and HLRRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRKZX	HLRRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.95%	-62.78%	+15.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-6.72%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	-21.04%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.96%	-28.99%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.95%	-48.13%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-2.85%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-8.48%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	2.96%	+0.07%

Volatility

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) is 3.28%, while LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that PRKZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRKZX	HLRRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.48%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	8.22%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.06%	12.61%	-1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	17.38%	-2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	20.82%	-3.62%

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRKZX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison

PRKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than HLRRX's 9.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund	9.50%	9.39%	4.93%	5.50%	13.71%	17.02%	9.10%	2.44%	2.68%	17.61%	15.94%	10.13%
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund	6.75%	7.09%	8.63%	4.25%	5.53%	29.71%	4.27%	4.53%	5.65%	5.18%	4.96%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRKZX and HLRRX in my portfolio?

PRKZX and HLRRX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRKZX or HLRRX?

HLRRX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to PRKZX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRKZX dropped -46.95% vs HLRRX's -62.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRKZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.