PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRKZX vs. HLRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and LDR High Income Realty Fund (HLRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRKZX having a 14.94% return and HLRRX slightly higher at 15.27%. Over the past 10 years, PRKZX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.


PRKZX

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.02%
6M
10.53%
YTD
14.94%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
5.54%
ALL TIME*
6.72%

HLRRX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.61%
6M
11.33%
YTD
15.27%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
4.24%
ALL TIME*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRKZX
PGIM Real Estate Income Fund
14.94%3.74%17.55%10.54%-16.17%21.17%-8.68%30.19%-10.05%6.55%
HLRRX
LDR High Income Realty Fund
15.27%-9.13%9.45%10.50%-21.40%40.50%-3.78%31.75%-13.63%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PRKZX and HLRRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between PRKZX and HLRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRKZX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRKZX
PRKZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PRKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PRKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HLRRX
HLRRX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HLRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HLRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and LDR High Income Realty Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRKZXHLRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.02

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

5.42

+0.33

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRKZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the HLRRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRKZX and HLRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRKZX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, smaller than the maximum HLRRX drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRKZX and HLRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRKZXHLRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.95%

-62.78%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-6.26%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-21.04%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-28.99%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.95%

-48.13%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-2.84%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-8.46%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.33%

+0.67%

Volatility

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to LDR High Income Realty Fund (HLRRX) at 2.54%. This indicates that PRKZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRKZXHLRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.54%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

8.08%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

12.14%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

17.18%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

20.78%

-3.60%

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRKZX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRKZX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison

PRKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, less than HLRRX's 12.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLRRX
LDR High Income Realty Fund
12.10%9.39%4.93%5.50%13.71%17.02%9.10%2.44%2.68%17.61%15.94%10.13%
PRKZX
PGIM Real Estate Income Fund
6.71%7.09%8.63%4.25%5.53%29.71%4.27%4.53%5.65%5.18%4.96%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRKZX and HLRRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRKZX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to HLRRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRKZX dropped -46.95% vs HLRRX's -62.78%.

PRKZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRKZX and HLRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer