PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRJZX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRJZX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than PJFAX's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PRJZX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 16.10%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.36% annualized return.


PRJZX

1D
1.60%
1M
6.16%
YTD
8.72%
6M
5.81%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
16.10%

PJFAX

1D
0.73%
1M
8.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.66%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
20.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRJZX
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund
8.72%4.91%28.69%41.55%-39.60%7.45%74.45%34.13%-2.61%43.35%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.93%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PRJZX and PJFAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.95

The correlation between PRJZX and PJFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRJZX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRJZX
PRJZX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PRJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PRJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRJZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.47

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

2.03

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.35

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.31

4.32

-2.01

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRJZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRJZX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRJZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.47

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.61

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.85

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Drawdowns

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRJZX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJZX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRJZXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.22%

-64.07%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.57%

-17.76%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-24.05%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.22%

-43.56%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.22%

-43.56%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-20.35%

+10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.14%

5.55%

+1.59%

Volatility

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) at 3.73%. This indicates that PRJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRJZXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

3.73%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

12.33%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

16.29%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

24.69%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.21%

24.01%

-0.80%

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRJZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRJZX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PRJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.74%, more than PJFAX's 12.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.20%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%
PRJZX
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund
22.74%24.73%10.59%0.00%0.00%10.12%1.59%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PRJZX and PJFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRJZX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to PJFAX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRJZX dropped -48.22% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PJFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRJZX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer