PRJZX vs. SCHF
PRJZX (PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both funds - PRJZX is a Global Equities fund managed by PGIM, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Over the past 10 years, PRJZX returned 17.11%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for SCHF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRJZX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRJZX achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 13.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PRJZX has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 17.11%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
PRJZX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 17.11%
SCHF
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 31.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund | 11.99% | 4.91% | 28.69% | 41.55% | -39.60% | 7.45% | 74.45% | 34.13% | -2.61% | 43.35% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 13.98% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRJZX and SCHF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PRJZX and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRJZX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
PRJZX
SCHF
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRJZX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.73 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 10.46 | -7.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRJZX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJZX and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRJZX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.22% | -34.87% | -13.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.57% | -11.48% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -13.41% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.22% | -29.14% | -19.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -34.87% | -13.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -3.15% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -7.36% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 2.99% | +4.20% |
Volatility
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 7.22%. This indicates that PRJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRJZX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 7.22% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.32% | 14.80% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 16.92% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 16.61% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 17.05% | +6.33% |
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRJZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRJZX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
PRJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.08%, more than SCHF's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund | 22.08% | 24.73% | 10.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.12% | 1.59% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.00% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRJZX and SCHF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRJZX has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to SCHF (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRJZX dropped -48.22% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRJZX and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer