PJFAX vs. EGFIX

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly higher than EGFIX's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has underperformed EGFIX with an annualized return of 7.71%, while EGFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than EGFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and Edgewood Growth Fund (EGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the EGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and EGFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither PJFAX nor EGFIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -67.83%, which is greater than EGFIX's maximum drawdown of -54.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and EGFIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) is 11.69%, while Edgewood Growth Fund (EGFIX) has a volatility of 19.69%. This indicates that PJFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.