PRJZX vs. CAEIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRJZX (PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund) and CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PRJZX returned 16.17%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for CAEIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRJZX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CAEIX.

Performance

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRJZX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PRJZX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 16.17%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.

PRJZX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 7.23%
• YTD: 9.40%
• 6M: 6.03%
• 1Y: 15.03%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 16.17%

CAEIX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 23.10%
• 6M: 23.57%
• 1Y: 49.07%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund	9.40%	4.91%	28.69%	41.55%	-39.60%	7.45%	74.45%	34.13%	-2.61%	43.35%
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	23.10%	32.61%	-7.13%	5.67%	-17.43%	6.73%	61.52%	33.48%	-19.26%	29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PRJZX and CAEIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.72

The correlation between PRJZX and CAEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRJZX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRJZX

PRJZX Risk / Return Rank: 9
PRJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PRJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CAEIX

CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRJZX	CAEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	3.08	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	3.95	-2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.52	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	6.03	-5.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.14	20.83	-18.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRJZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRJZX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRJZX	CAEIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	3.08	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.34	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.60	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.07	+0.61

Drawdowns

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRJZX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJZX and CAEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRJZX	CAEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.22%	-75.81%	+27.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.57%	-8.39%	-13.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.19%	-24.57%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.22%	-32.58%	-15.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.22%	-37.54%	-10.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.99%	-48.64%	+38.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.14%	2.42%	+4.72%

Volatility

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) at 5.76%. This indicates that PRJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRJZX	CAEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	5.76%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	12.91%	+3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	16.43%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.87%	19.18%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	19.69%	+3.53%

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRJZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRJZX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

PRJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.60%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	0.59%	0.72%	1.17%	1.07%	0.86%	0.49%	0.82%	1.23%	2.00%	1.40%	1.79%	0.72%
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund	22.60%	24.73%	10.59%	0.00%	0.00%	10.12%	1.59%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRJZX and CAEIX in my portfolio?

PRJZX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRJZX or CAEIX?

PRJZX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to CAEIX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRJZX dropped -48.22% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.