PRGS vs. PZG
PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) and PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) are both stocks. PRGS operates in Software - Application (Technology), while PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PRGS returned 3.19%/yr vs -2.68%/yr for PZG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRGS vs. PZG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -26.75% return, which is significantly lower than PZG's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGS has outperformed PZG with an annualized return of 3.19%, while PZG has yielded a comparatively lower -2.68% annualized return.
PRGS
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- YTD
- -26.75%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -49.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.45%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
PZG
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 95.51%
- 3Y*
- 61.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
PRGS vs. PZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | -26.75% | -34.06% | 21.16% | 8.94% | 6.05% | 8.44% | 10.64% | 18.95% | -15.41% | 35.45% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -3.17% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGS and PZG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PRGS and PZG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRGS:
$1.34B
PZG:
$101.42M
PRGS:
$1.95
PZG:
-$0.09
PRGS:
2.70
PZG:
2.87
PRGS:
$987.62M
PZG:
$0.00
PRGS:
$802.40M
PZG:
-$892.14K
PRGS:
$136.06M
PZG:
-$11.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGS vs. PZG — Risk / Return Rank
PRGS
PZG
PRGS vs. PZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRGS | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.26 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.81 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 4.55 | -5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRGS vs. PZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum PZG drawdown of -93.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and PZG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGS | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.33% | -93.81% | +26.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.14% | -59.18% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.10% | -59.18% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.10% | -74.05% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.10% | -90.14% | +26.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.97% | -72.40% | +17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.57% | -68.56% | +44.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.81% | 23.55% | +15.26% |
Volatility
PRGS vs. PZG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is 14.81%, while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a volatility of 20.02%. This indicates that PRGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGS | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.81% | 20.02% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.69% | 58.59% | -16.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.89% | 72.84% | -23.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.42% | 63.02% | -29.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 60.76% | -27.59% |
Dividends
PRGS vs. PZG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRGS nor PZG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 1.29% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.21% | 0.39% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRGS vs. PZG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRGS and PZG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to PRGS (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGS dropped -67.33% vs PZG's -93.81%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGS and PZG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer