PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGS vs. AYTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRGS vs. AYTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -26.75% return, which is significantly lower than AYTU's -17.31% return.


PRGS

1D
-0.38%
1M
17.43%
YTD
-26.75%
6M
-29.75%
1Y
-49.74%
3Y*
-19.45%
5Y*
-7.35%
10Y*
3.19%

AYTU

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-17.31%
6M
-6.52%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
-54.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGS vs. AYTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
-26.75%-34.06%21.16%8.94%6.05%8.44%10.64%18.95%-15.41%54.35%
AYTU
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
-17.31%52.94%-40.14%-24.87%-86.00%-77.42%-38.35%22.41%-98.22%-89.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGS and AYTU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRGS:

$1.34B

AYTU:

$22.60M

EPS

PRGS:

$1.95

AYTU:

-$2.91

PS Ratio

PRGS:

1.39

AYTU:

0.44

PB Ratio

PRGS:

2.70

AYTU:

0.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRGS:

$987.62M

AYTU:

$56.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRGS:

$802.40M

AYTU:

$36.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

PRGS:

$136.06M

AYTU:

-$27.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGS vs. AYTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGS
PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AYTU
AYTU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AYTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYTU Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AYTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGS vs. AYTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRGSAYTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.08

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.29

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

0.68

-1.97

PRGS vs. AYTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGS Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the AYTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGS and AYTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGS vs. AYTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum AYTU drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and AYTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSAYTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.33%

-100.00%

+32.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.14%

-35.47%

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.10%

-70.24%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.10%

-99.12%

+35.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.97%

-100.00%

+45.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-95.26%

+71.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.81%

15.16%

+23.65%

Volatility

PRGS vs. AYTU - Volatility Comparison

Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) at 12.94%. This indicates that PRGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGSAYTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

12.94%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.69%

33.57%

+8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.89%

54.47%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.42%

85.63%

-52.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.17%

188.01%

-154.84%

Dividends

PRGS vs. AYTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRGS nor AYTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AYTU
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%

Financials

PRGS vs. AYTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and Aytu BioPharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
247.80M
12.41M
(PRGS) Total Revenue
(AYTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRGS vs. AYTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Progress Software Corporation and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
82.3%
61.2%
Portfolio components
PRGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.94M and revenue of 247.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.3%.

AYTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.60M and revenue of 12.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

PRGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported an operating income of 46.47M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

AYTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.06M and revenue of 12.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -32.8%.

PRGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a net income of 22.81M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

AYTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported a net income of -5.62M and revenue of 12.41M, resulting in a net margin of -45.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRGS and AYTU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGS has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to AYTU (12.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGS dropped -67.33% vs AYTU's -100.00%.

AYTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGS and AYTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer