PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGO vs. ES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRGO vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGO achieves a -21.17% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGO has underperformed ES with an annualized return of -17.69%, while ES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.58% annualized return.


PRGO

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
-21.17%
6M
-21.40%
1Y
-57.19%
3Y*
-28.11%
5Y*
-22.71%
10Y*
-17.69%

ES

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
3.55%
6M
6.87%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGO vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc
-21.17%-42.79%-16.92%-2.47%-9.78%-10.95%-11.97%35.65%-55.08%5.58%
ES
Eversource Energy
3.55%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGO and ES is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1991

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRGO:

$1.45B

ES:

$25.68B

EPS

PRGO:

-$13.12

ES:

$4.68

PS Ratio

PRGO:

0.35

ES:

1.83

PB Ratio

PRGO:

0.58

ES:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRGO:

$4.18B

ES:

$13.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRGO:

$1.43B

ES:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRGO:

-$1.33B

ES:

$4.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGO vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGO
PRGO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PRGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGO vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGOESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.10

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

0.62

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

1.50

-2.85

PRGO vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGO Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGO and ES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGOESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

0.38

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

0.01

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.47

0.23

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.28

-0.26

Drawdowns

PRGO vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGO drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGO and ES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGOESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.10%

-73.04%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.58%

-15.13%

-50.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.55%

-28.65%

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.24%

-41.69%

-35.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.93%

-41.69%

-47.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.15%

-13.96%

-79.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.45%

-19.07%

-30.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.39%

6.19%

+36.20%

Volatility

PRGO vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 6.82%. This indicates that PRGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGOESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.31%

6.82%

+6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.77%

15.38%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.80%

24.22%

+21.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.15%

23.87%

+12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.40%

24.31%

+13.09%

Dividends

PRGO vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

PRGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than ES's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.52%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc
11.09%8.33%4.29%3.39%3.05%2.47%2.01%1.59%1.96%0.73%0.70%0.35%

Financials

PRGO vs. ES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perrigo Company plc and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
969.20M
4.50B
(PRGO) Total Revenue
(ES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGO and ES have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGO has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to ES (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGO dropped -94.10% vs ES's -73.04%.

ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGO and ES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer