PRFZ vs. WCEO
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. PRFZ is passively managed, while WCEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRFZ returned 18.53%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for WCEO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WCEO.
Performance
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than WCEO's 13.01% return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
WCEO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 29.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 16.06% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 17.73% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 13.01% | 9.77% | 8.28% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and WCEO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PRFZ and WCEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFZ
WCEO
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
PRFZ
WCEO
Healthcare
PRFZ
WCEO
Industrials
PRFZ
WCEO
Financial Services
PRFZ
WCEO
Consumer Cyclical
PRFZ
WCEO
Real Estate
PRFZ
WCEO
Energy
PRFZ
WCEO
Basic Materials
PRFZ
WCEO
Communication Services
PRFZ
WCEO
Consumer Defensive
PRFZ
WCEO
Utilities
PRFZ
WCEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. WCEO — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
WCEO
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.27 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 13.27 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than WCEO's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and WCEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -25.88% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -6.96% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -25.88% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.48% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -5.44% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.23% | +0.78% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) at 3.75%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 3.75% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 10.42% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 15.22% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 18.07% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 18.07% | +4.37% |
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WCEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. WCEO - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than WCEO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.81% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 0.57% | 0.64% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PRFZ and WCEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PRFZ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to WCEO (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs WCEO's -25.88%.
On 3-year performance, PRFZ leads with 18.53% vs 15.18% for WCEO. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 15.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.
PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.57% for WCEO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hypatia Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.85% for WCEO.
WCEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and WCEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer