PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 11.70%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.


PRFZ

1D
1.26%
1M
2.57%
6M
13.47%
YTD
19.43%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
10.13%

VBR

1D
0.51%
1M
2.56%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.11%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
19.43%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
16.11%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and VBR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006

0.96

The correlation between PRFZ and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
VBR

Technology

19.5%
12.1%

Healthcare

17.8%
8.3%

Industrials

16.1%
17.4%

Financial Services

13.6%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
12.5%

Real Estate

6.9%
10.5%

Energy

4.4%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.8%

Utilities

1.3%
4.6%

Technology

PRFZ
19.5%
VBR
12.1%

Healthcare

PRFZ
17.8%
VBR
8.3%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.1%
VBR
17.4%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.6%
VBR
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
11.2%
VBR
12.5%

Real Estate

PRFZ
6.9%
VBR
10.5%

Energy

PRFZ
4.4%
VBR
4.3%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.2%
VBR
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
3.0%
VBR
4.0%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
VBR
2.8%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.3%
VBR
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.77

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

9.83

+0.59

PRFZ vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-61.98%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-8.85%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-24.19%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-24.19%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-45.28%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-0.94%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-8.22%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.49%

+0.55%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 2.89%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.89%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

10.49%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

14.98%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

19.57%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

21.66%

+0.72%

PRFZ vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VBR's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.79%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFZ and VBR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFZ has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VBR (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.70% vs 10.56% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.79% for PRFZ.

PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.05% for VBR.

PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer