PRFZ vs. FESM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. PRFZ is passively managed, while FESM is actively managed. Over the past year, PRFZ returned 34.11% vs 51.65% for FESM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.

Performance

PRFZ vs. FESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 24.59% return.

PRFZ

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 6M: 13.71%
• 1Y: 34.11%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

FESM

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 24.59%
• 6M: 22.07%
• 1Y: 51.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF	16.06%	11.26%	12.68%	12.78%
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	24.59%	17.88%	16.22%	12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and FESM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.97

The correlation between PRFZ and FESM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. FESM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRFZ	FESM
Technology	19.6%	23.3%
Healthcare	16.8%	16.1%
Industrials	16.6%	18.5%
Financial Services	13.2%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	7.7%
Real Estate	7.2%	3.9%
Energy	5.0%	5.9%
Basic Materials	3.5%	4.0%
Communication Services	2.9%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	1.1%
Utilities	1.5%	1.8%

Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ

PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FESM

FESM Risk / Return Rank: 85
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRFZ	FESM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.66	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.53	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	5.10	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.37	18.36	-6.99

PRFZ vs. FESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FESM Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and FESM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and FESM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRFZ	FESM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.41%	-26.93%	-35.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-10.18%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.78%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-4.71%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.82%	+0.19%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.54%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRFZ	FESM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	6.38%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	14.11%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	19.54%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	21.32%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.44%	21.32%	+1.12%

PRFZ vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRFZ vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than FESM's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	0.73%	0.82%	1.08%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF	0.81%	0.82%	1.45%	1.42%	1.33%	0.93%	0.91%	1.29%	1.37%	0.97%	1.31%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRFZ and FESM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PRFZ and FESM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRFZ or FESM?

FESM has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to PRFZ (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs FESM's -26.93%.

Which ETF is better, PRFZ or FESM?

On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 51.65% vs 34.11% for PRFZ. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRFZ or FESM?

Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 51.65% return vs 34.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRFZ or FESM?

FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRFZ or FESM?

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.73% for FESM.

What is the main difference between PRFZ and FESM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.28% for FESM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.