PRFRX vs. GECC
PRFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while GECC (Great Elm Capital Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PRFRX returned 7.21%/yr vs -9.80%/yr for GECC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRFRX vs. GECC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFRX achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than GECC's -6.84% return.
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
GECC
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -9.65%
- 1Y
- -30.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- -9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
PRFRX vs. GECC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 1.96% | 9.82% | 11.04% | 13.78% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
GECC Great Elm Capital Corp. | -6.84% | -25.44% | 18.85% | 50.81% | -47.39% | -4.46% | -36.93% | 12.30% | -11.10% | -7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFRX and GECC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2016 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFRX vs. GECC — Risk / Return Rank
PRFRX
GECC
PRFRX vs. GECC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) and Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRFRX | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | -0.76 | +4.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.66 | -0.88 | +9.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.40 | 0.87 | +1.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.92 | -0.57 | +6.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.48 | -0.93 | +23.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRFRX | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | -0.76 | +4.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.48 | -0.32 | +2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | -0.28 | +1.72 |
Drawdowns
PRFRX vs. GECC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum GECC drawdown of -74.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFRX and GECC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFRX | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.05% | -74.01% | +53.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -53.97% | +52.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.35% | -53.97% | +51.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.94% | -57.49% | +51.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -65.02% | +65.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -40.34% | +39.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 32.84% | -32.44% |
Volatility
PRFRX vs. GECC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) is 0.81%, while Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) has a volatility of 19.72%. This indicates that PRFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GECC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFRX | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 19.72% | -18.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 30.57% | -28.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 39.95% | -37.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 30.59% | -27.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 36.80% | -32.88% |
Dividends
PRFRX vs. GECC - Dividend Comparison
PRFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, less than GECC's 22.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GECC Great Elm Capital Corp. | 22.74% | 21.01% | 13.19% | 14.09% | 23.52% | 12.99% | 31.60% | 13.44% | 12.69% | 10.12% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 9.76% | 9.99% | 10.20% | 9.57% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFRX and GECC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GECC has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to PRFRX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFRX dropped -20.05% vs GECC's -74.01%.
PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFRX and GECC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer