PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GECC vs. PBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GECC vs. PBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GECC achieves a -16.25% return, which is significantly lower than PBT's 75.82% return.


GECC

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.20%
6M
-15.84%
YTD
-16.25%
1Y
-41.62%
3Y*
0.76%
5Y*
-10.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.09%

PBT

1D
-0.39%
1M
19.57%
6M
63.23%
YTD
75.82%
1Y
127.41%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
45.95%
10Y*
23.57%
ALL TIME*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$265.65K$254.93K$519.79K
$3.31M$2.81M$4.19M

GECC vs. PBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GECC
Great Elm Capital Corp.
-16.25%-25.44%18.85%50.81%-47.39%-4.46%-36.93%12.30%-11.10%-7.41%
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
75.82%56.75%-16.91%-42.84%166.22%218.45%-7.68%-29.15%-28.11%23.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GECC and PBT is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2016

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GECC:

$59.27M

PBT:

$1.38B

EPS

GECC:

-$2.11

PBT:

$0.38

PS Ratio

GECC:

1.74

PBT:

70.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

GECC:

$37.98M

PBT:

$13.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GECC:

$32.17M

PBT:

$13.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

GECC:

-$7.56M

PBT:

$11.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GECC vs. PBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GECC
GECC Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GECC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GECC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GECC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GECC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GECC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PBT
PBT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GECC vs. PBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GECCPBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.41

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

5.89

-6.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

14.86

-15.98

GECC vs. PBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GECC Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the PBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GECC and PBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GECC vs. PBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GECC drawdown since its inception was -74.01%, smaller than the maximum PBT drawdown of -83.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GECC and PBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GECCPBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.01%

-83.17%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.97%

-21.46%

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.97%

-60.31%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.35%

-65.05%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.56%

-4.21%

-64.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-25.62%

-15.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.17%

8.48%

+28.69%

Volatility

GECC vs. PBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) is 5.55%, while Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a volatility of 12.43%. This indicates that GECC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GECCPBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

12.43%

-6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.16%

33.49%

-4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.61%

44.35%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.69%

47.53%

-16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.87%

42.96%

-6.09%

Dividends

GECC vs. PBT - Dividend Comparison

GECC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.55%, more than PBT's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GECC
Great Elm Capital Corp.
29.55%21.01%13.19%14.09%23.52%12.99%31.60%13.44%12.69%10.12%1.42%0.00%
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
1.34%1.92%4.92%4.30%4.56%2.28%7.10%10.80%11.20%7.09%5.38%6.81%

Financials

GECC vs. PBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Great Elm Capital Corp. and Permian Basin Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GECC and PBT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBT has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to GECC (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GECC dropped -74.01% vs PBT's -83.17%.

PBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GECC and PBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer