PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFD vs. PFLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFD vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFD achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 2.69% return.


PRFD

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.56%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
10Y*

PFLD

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.69%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFD vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRFD and PFLD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.44

The correlation between PRFD and PFLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRFD vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFD
PFLD

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Financial Services

PRFD
2.0%
PFLD

-

Communication Services

PRFD
0.3%
PFLD

-

Basic Materials

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Consumer Defensive

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Energy

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Healthcare

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Industrials

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Real Estate

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Technology

PRFD

-

PFLD

-

Utilities

PRFD

-

PFLD
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFD vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFD
PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFD vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFDPFLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

1.85

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

3.01

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.81

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.14

12.46

-2.32

PRFD vs. PFLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the PFLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFD and PFLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFDPFLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.85

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.17

+1.14

Drawdowns

PRFD vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFD drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, smaller than the maximum PFLD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFD and PFLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDPFLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-33.20%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-2.23%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

-6.41%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

0.00%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-4.17%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.50%

+0.29%

Volatility

PRFD vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.84%. This indicates that PRFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDPFLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.84%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

2.26%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

3.39%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

7.50%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

13.38%

-8.50%

PRFD vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFD vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison

PRFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than PFLD's 5.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.60%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.77%5.63%5.53%5.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFD and PFLD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFD has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to PFLD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFD dropped -11.93% vs PFLD's -33.20%.

On 3-year performance, PRFD leads with 9.23% vs 4.93% for PFLD. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.

PRFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PRFD and 0.45% for PFLD.

PRFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFD and PFLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer