PRFD vs. EMNT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRFD (PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while EMNT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRFD returned 9.23%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for EMNT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRFD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EMNT.

Performance

PRFD vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFD achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than EMNT's 1.64% return.

PRFD

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 8.04%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMNT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFD vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.40%	8.45%	9.92%	1.83%
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	1.64%	4.74%	5.79%	5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFD and EMNT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023	0.20

The correlation between PRFD and EMNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRFD vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFD

PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 69
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EMNT

EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 99
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFD vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRFD	EMNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	10.63	-8.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	21.17	-17.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	5.63	-4.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	33.45	-30.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	235.99	-225.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRFD vs. EMNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is lower than the EMNT Sharpe Ratio of 10.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFD and EMNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRFD	EMNT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	10.63	-8.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	4.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	3.51	-2.20

Drawdowns

PRFD vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFD drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFD and EMNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRFD	EMNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-2.28%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.28%	-0.13%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.28%	-0.73%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.02%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-0.23%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.02%	+0.77%

Volatility

PRFD vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) at 0.14%. This indicates that PRFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRFD	EMNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	0.14%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.68%	0.34%	+2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21%	0.41%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.88%	0.83%	+4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	0.86%	+4.02%

PRFD vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRFD vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison

PRFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than EMNT's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	4.00%	4.46%	5.14%	4.62%	2.79%	0.66%	1.44%
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	5.77%	5.63%	5.53%	5.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRFD and EMNT in my portfolio?

PRFD and EMNT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRFD or EMNT?

PRFD has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to EMNT (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFD dropped -11.93% vs EMNT's -2.28%.

Which ETF is better, PRFD or EMNT?

On 3-year performance, PRFD leads with 9.23% vs 5.24% for EMNT. On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EMNT has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRFD or EMNT?

Over the 3-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRFD or EMNT?

EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRFD or EMNT?

PRFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 4.00% for EMNT.

What is the main difference between PRFD and EMNT?

PRFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while EMNT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PRFD and 0.24% for EMNT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.63 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.