PRF vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRF returned 20.66%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for SCMB. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

PRF vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.03% return.

PRF

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 13.92%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 31.21%
• 3Y*: 20.66%
• 5Y*: 12.37%
• 10Y*: 13.59%

SCMB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	13.92%	18.33%	16.73%	15.72%	11.01%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.03%	3.78%	0.91%	5.86%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and SCMB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.16

PRF vs. SCMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRF	SCMB
Technology	20.9%	0.9%
Financial Services	15.4%	8.8%
Healthcare	11.7%	0.1%
Communication Services	10.2%	0.5%
Industrials	9.2%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	2.6%
Energy	8.2%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	0.1%
Basic Materials	3.4%	0.0%
Utilities	3.1%	0.2%
Real Estate	2.5%	3.4%

Return for Risk

PRF vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 91
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 71
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRF	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.34	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.44	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.50	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	2.33	+2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.58	7.75	+11.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRF vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRF	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.34	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.97	-0.49

Drawdowns

PRF vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRF	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.35%	-6.13%	-54.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	-2.92%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	-5.57%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-0.90%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-1.32%	-5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	0.88%	+0.72%

Volatility

PRF vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.00%. This indicates that PRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRF	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	1.00%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	2.17%	+5.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	2.91%	+7.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	4.16%	+11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	4.16%	+13.52%

PRF vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRF vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SCMB's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.39%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRF and SCMB in my portfolio?

PRF and SCMB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRF or SCMB?

PRF has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to SCMB (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, PRF or SCMB?

On 3-year performance, PRF leads with 20.66% vs 3.23% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRF or SCMB?

Over the 3-year period, PRF has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRF or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRF or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.39% for PRF.

What is the main difference between PRF and SCMB?

PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.