PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRF vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRF vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 13.42%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


PRF

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.92%
6M
12.42%
YTD
16.31%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
13.42%
ALL TIME*
10.61%

SCHX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.52%
6M
7.65%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
16.31%18.33%16.73%15.72%-7.79%31.12%7.78%27.42%-8.71%16.01%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
9.33%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and SCHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.92

The correlation between PRF and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRF vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRF
SCHX

Technology

22.3%
36.7%

Financial Services

16.0%
11.7%

Healthcare

12.6%
9.2%

Industrials

9.3%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

8.7%
9.7%

Energy

7.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
4.6%

Utilities

3.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
2.1%

Technology

PRF
22.3%
SCHX
36.7%

Financial Services

PRF
16.0%
SCHX
11.7%

Healthcare

PRF
12.6%
SCHX
9.2%

Industrials

PRF
9.3%
SCHX
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PRF
9.0%
SCHX
9.6%

Communication Services

PRF
8.7%
SCHX
9.7%

Energy

PRF
7.1%
SCHX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PRF
6.2%
SCHX
4.6%

Utilities

PRF
3.1%
SCHX
2.2%

Basic Materials

PRF
3.0%
SCHX
1.8%

Real Estate

PRF
2.6%
SCHX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRF vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF
PRF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.27

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

2.12

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.03

9.05

+8.98

PRF vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRF vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.35%

-34.33%

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-9.02%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-19.04%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-25.41%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-34.33%

-3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.95%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-3.95%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.11%

-0.50%

Volatility

PRF vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 1.79%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

3.18%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

10.06%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

12.72%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

17.21%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

18.14%

-0.55%

PRF vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRF vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SCHX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.37%1.59%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.04%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRF and SCHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to PRF (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 14.84% vs 13.42% for PRF. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.04% for SCHX.

PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.03% for SCHX.

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRF and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer