PRF vs. SCHX
PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRF returned 13.59%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
PRF vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.
PRF
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 31.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
PRF vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 13.92% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.56% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and SCHX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PRF and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRF vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRF
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PRF
SCHX
Financial Services
PRF
SCHX
Healthcare
PRF
SCHX
Communication Services
PRF
SCHX
Industrials
PRF
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
PRF
SCHX
Energy
PRF
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
PRF
SCHX
Basic Materials
PRF
SCHX
Utilities
PRF
SCHX
Real Estate
PRF
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRF vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
PRF
SCHX
PRF vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRF | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | 2.69 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.58 | 12.15 | +7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRF | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 1.98 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.75 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PRF vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRF | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -34.33% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -9.02% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -19.04% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -25.41% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | -34.33% | -3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.64% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -3.97% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 2.00% | -0.40% |
Volatility
PRF vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 3.02%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRF | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.84% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.00% | 9.44% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 12.27% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 17.16% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 18.17% | -0.49% |
PRF vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRF vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF and SCHX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to PRF (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.20% vs 13.59% for PRF. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.03% for SCHX.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRF and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer