PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRF vs. IUSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRF vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has outperformed IUSV with an annualized return of 13.67%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.


PRF

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.19%
YTD
14.79%
6M
15.01%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
13.67%

IUSV

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.24%
YTD
7.63%
6M
7.88%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
14.79%18.33%16.73%15.72%-7.79%31.12%7.78%27.42%-8.71%16.01%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
7.63%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and IUSV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2005

0.97

The correlation between PRF and IUSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRF vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRF
IUSV

Technology

20.9%
20.8%

Financial Services

15.4%
15.0%

Healthcare

11.7%
11.0%

Communication Services

10.2%
3.1%

Industrials

9.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
11.1%

Energy

8.2%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
8.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.6%

Utilities

3.1%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.5%
3.7%

Technology

PRF
20.9%
IUSV
20.8%

Financial Services

PRF
15.4%
IUSV
15.0%

Healthcare

PRF
11.7%
IUSV
11.0%

Communication Services

PRF
10.2%
IUSV
3.1%

Industrials

PRF
9.2%
IUSV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PRF
9.1%
IUSV
11.1%

Energy

PRF
8.2%
IUSV
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

PRF
6.3%
IUSV
8.8%

Basic Materials

PRF
3.4%
IUSV
3.6%

Utilities

PRF
3.1%
IUSV
4.3%

Real Estate

PRF
2.5%
IUSV
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRF vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF
PRF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFIUSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.38

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

3.35

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.67

12.84

+7.82

PRF vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFIUSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.14

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.72

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

PRF vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and IUSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFIUSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.35%

-56.88%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-6.36%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-17.76%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-17.95%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-37.54%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.51%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-6.29%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.66%

-0.07%

Volatility

PRF vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.14%. This indicates that PRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFIUSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.14%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

7.14%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

9.98%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

14.55%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

17.07%

+0.60%

PRF vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRF vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than IUSV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.68%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.38%1.59%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PRF and IUSV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to IUSV (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.67% vs 12.04% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.

PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.04% for IUSV.

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRF and IUSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer