PRF vs. INCE
PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. PRF is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRF returned 13.48%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for INCE. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
PRF vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 16.28% return.
PRF
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.75%
INCE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.28M | $6.88M | $3.19M | |
| $14.15M | $15.87M | $21.40M |
PRF vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 19.74% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 16.28% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and INCE is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PRF and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRF vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRF
INCE
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
PRF
INCE
Financial Services
PRF
INCE
Healthcare
PRF
INCE
Industrials
PRF
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
PRF
INCE
Communication Services
PRF
INCE
Energy
PRF
INCE
Consumer Defensive
PRF
INCE
Utilities
PRF
INCE
Basic Materials
PRF
INCE
Real Estate
PRF
INCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRF vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
PRF
INCE
PRF vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRF | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.60 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 5.43 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.28 | 20.94 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRF vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRF | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -33.95% | -26.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -4.90% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -14.01% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -18.40% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.13% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.88% | -3.21% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.27% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PRF vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.40%. This indicates that PRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRF | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.40% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 6.13% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 8.32% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 13.26% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 15.59% | +2.01% |
PRF vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRF vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than INCE's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.33% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF and INCE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRF has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to INCE (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, PRF leads with 13.48% vs 10.70% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 1.33% for PRF.
PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRF and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer