PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDGX vs. GSFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDGX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than GSFTX's 9.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRDGX having a 13.14% annualized return and GSFTX not far behind at 12.79%.


PRDGX

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.12%
YTD
7.88%
6M
6.69%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
13.14%

GSFTX

1D
0.38%
1M
0.78%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.11%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.88%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
9.24%15.88%15.00%10.57%-4.94%26.26%7.75%28.12%-4.38%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDGX and GSFTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1998

0.94

The correlation between PRDGX and GSFTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRDGX vs. GSFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GSFTX
GSFTX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRDGXGSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.82

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

14.40

-4.69

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the GSFTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDGX and GSFTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, roughly equal to the maximum GSFTX drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and GSFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDGXGSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.79%

-47.69%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-5.51%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-13.01%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-17.01%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

-32.76%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.66%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-6.36%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.46%

+0.33%

Volatility

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) at 2.67%. This indicates that PRDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRDGXGSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.67%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

6.89%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

9.19%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

13.25%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.68%

+0.17%

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRDGX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GSFTX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRDGX vs. GSFTX - Dividend Comparison

PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than GSFTX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
4.94%5.35%6.02%4.96%3.87%2.87%1.74%2.90%7.63%4.00%3.77%8.27%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.50%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PRDGX and GSFTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRDGX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to GSFTX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDGX dropped -49.79% vs GSFTX's -47.69%.

GSFTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRDGX and GSFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer