PRAY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NONE, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. PRAY is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, PRAY returned 21.66% vs 2.89% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PRAY charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

PRAY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAY achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.16% return.

PRAY

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 15.46%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	15.33%	9.08%	13.02%	12.59%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.16%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAY and BAMU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

PRAY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 52
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRAY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	5.01	-3.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	8.84	-6.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	2.43	-1.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	24.72	-22.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.59	97.89	-87.31

PRAY vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAY and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRAY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAY drawdown since its inception was -21.40%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRAY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.40%	-0.36%	-21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-0.12%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	0.00%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-0.02%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	0.03%	+2.02%

Volatility

PRAY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that PRAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRAY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	0.09%	+5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	0.40%	+11.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	0.58%	+12.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.08%	0.87%	+15.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	0.87%	+15.21%

PRAY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRAY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

PRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.60%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRAY and BAMU in my portfolio?

PRAY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRAY or BAMU?

PRAY has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAY dropped -21.40% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, PRAY or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, PRAY leads with 21.66% vs 2.89% for BAMU. On fees, PRAY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRAY or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, PRAY has performed better with a 21.66% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRAY or BAMU?

PRAY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRAY or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.60% for PRAY.

What is the main difference between PRAY and BAMU?

PRAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PRAY and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.