PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRAM.L is traded in USD, while SEDY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEDY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAM.L achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than SEDY.L's 10.45% return.


PRAM.L

1D
-1.56%
1M
4.75%
YTD
24.27%
6M
27.23%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*

SEDY.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
10.45%
6M
11.01%
1Y
27.82%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRAM.L
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
24.27%32.60%7.14%9.82%-16.79%0.00%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
10.45%27.65%6.90%18.97%-30.91%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAM.L and SEDY.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.53

The correlation between PRAM.L and SEDY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRAM.L
SEDY.L

Technology

40.7%
8.3%

Financial Services

17.6%
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
17.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
1.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
8.7%

Energy

3.6%
18.2%

Healthcare

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.2%

Utilities

2.1%
7.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.8%

Technology

PRAM.L
40.7%
SEDY.L
8.3%

Financial Services

PRAM.L
17.6%
SEDY.L
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PRAM.L
9.1%
SEDY.L
4.2%

Industrials

PRAM.L
8.3%
SEDY.L
17.3%

Communication Services

PRAM.L
6.1%
SEDY.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

PRAM.L
5.8%
SEDY.L
8.7%

Energy

PRAM.L
3.6%
SEDY.L
18.2%

Healthcare

PRAM.L
2.8%
SEDY.L

-

Consumer Defensive

PRAM.L
2.8%
SEDY.L
2.2%

Utilities

PRAM.L
2.1%
SEDY.L
7.2%

Real Estate

PRAM.L
1.1%
SEDY.L
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAM.L
PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDY.L
SEDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRAM.LSEDY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.44

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.36

12.60

+1.76

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAM.L and SEDY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRAM.LSEDY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.09

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.22

+0.53

Drawdowns

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum SEDY.L drawdown of -48.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and SEDY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAM.LSEDY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.74%

-48.38%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-6.24%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.73%

-13.31%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-4.07%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-15.48%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.20%

+1.26%

Volatility

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) at 5.48%. This indicates that PRAM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAM.LSEDY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

5.48%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

10.93%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

13.23%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

16.99%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

17.52%

+3.87%

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SEDY.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAM.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison

PRAM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRAM.L
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
5.28%5.72%7.74%7.98%9.33%6.41%5.11%5.84%5.54%4.08%4.25%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAM.L and SEDY.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PRAM.L and 0.65% for SEDY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAM.L and SEDY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer