PRAFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
PRAFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 27, 2010. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 6.11% | 29.51% | 0.32% | 6.65% | -10.24% | 25.74% | 7.02% | 19.62% | -11.55% | 10.48% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAFX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRAFX having a 8.69% annualized return and FGIAX not far ahead at 8.70%.
PRAFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRAFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRAFX
FGIAX
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.75 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.26 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.61 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | 12.12 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.75 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.80 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.42 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAFX and FGIAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
PRAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 2.77% | 2.94% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.38% | 1.83% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 1.88% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAFX drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.05% | -49.35% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -8.29% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | -21.08% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.05% | -38.02% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -3.78% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -7.22% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.78% | +1.49% |
Volatility
PRAFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that PRAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 4.05% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 7.09% | +6.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 12.28% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 13.08% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 15.17% | +2.95% |