PRAFX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
PRAFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 27, 2010. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 6.11% | 29.51% | 0.32% | 6.65% | -10.24% | 25.74% | 7.02% | 19.62% | -11.55% | 10.48% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAFX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PRAFX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
PRAFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRAFX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRAFX
CSUAX
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.63 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.17 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.36 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | 10.32 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.63 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAFX and CSUAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
PRAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 2.77% | 2.94% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.38% | 1.83% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 1.88% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAFX drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAFX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.05% | -52.20% | +14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -7.98% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | -20.45% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.05% | -35.05% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -4.38% | -6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -8.49% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.83% | +1.44% |
Volatility
PRAFX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that PRAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 3.26% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 6.89% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 11.48% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 12.89% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 14.89% | +3.23% |