PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

PR.TO (Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF) and BPRF.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PR.TO returned 5.40%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for BPRF.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR.TO achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than BPRF.TO's 0.94% return.

PR.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
1.18%
6M
3.58%
YTD
3.48%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
6.03%

BPRF.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
0.31%
6M
0.59%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PR.TO
Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF		3.48%11.10%24.22%7.90%-18.17%28.22%-0.17%1.64%-6.76%
BPRF.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF		0.94%4.85%11.66%6.76%-13.36%3.72%5.32%16.17%-4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PR.TO and BPRF.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.12

The correlation between PR.TO and BPRF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF

Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF

Often compared with PR.TO:
PR.TO vs. PREF.TOPR.TO vs. CPD.TOPR.TO vs. DCP.TOPR.TO vs. HYBR.TOPR.TO vs. ZPR.TOPR.TO vs. BEPR.TOPR.TO vs. DXP.TO
Often compared with BPRF.TO:
BPRF.TO vs. BLOV.TOBPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TOBPRF.TO vs. BEPR.TOBPRF.TO vs. BFIN.TOBPRF.TO vs. BGIE.TOBPRF.TO vs. EDGF.TOBPRF.TO vs. KNGC.TO

Return for Risk

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PR.TO
PR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO
BPRF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PR.TOBPRF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.29
0.67

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.54
1.00

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.13

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.09

1.17

+4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.13

3.81

+18.32

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the BPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR.TO and BPRF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.17%, which is greater than BPRF.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR.TO and BPRF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PR.TOBPRF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.17%

-35.50%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-3.17%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.62%

-4.71%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-21.70%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.17%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.28%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-6.57%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.97%

-0.57%

Volatility

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) is 0.78%, while Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that PR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPRF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PR.TOBPRF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

2.01%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

4.21%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

5.58%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.58%

9.60%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

13.74%

-2.22%

Dividends

PR.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Dividend Comparison

PR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than BPRF.TO's 5.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRF.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF		5.89%5.78%5.72%6.02%5.71%4.69%4.65%4.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR.TO
Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF		5.00%4.85%4.49%4.80%4.71%3.85%4.79%4.69%4.97%6.73%3.68%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

PR.TO and BPRF.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Lysander and Brompton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR.TO and BPRF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer