BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO
BPRF.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF) and BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPRF.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton, while BDIV.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BPRF.TO returned 1.77%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for BDIV.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPRF.TO achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than BDIV.TO's 10.93% return.
BPRF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- —
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 0.58% | 4.85% | 11.66% | 6.76% | -13.36% | 3.72% | 5.32% | 16.17% | -3.94% |
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 10.93% | 18.14% | 25.34% | 11.23% | -16.24% | 22.15% | -0.56% | 22.02% | -6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPRF.TO and BDIV.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2018 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BPRF.TO
BDIV.TO
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) and Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPRF.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.22 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 9.64 | -5.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPRF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BDIV.TO drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPRF.TO and BDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPRF.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.50% | -36.44% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -9.11% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.71% | -13.65% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -24.34% | +2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -2.36% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -6.57% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 2.10% | -1.13% |
Volatility
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) is 2.00%, while Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that BPRF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPRF.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 3.94% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | 10.00% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.57% | 11.89% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 14.72% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 18.70% | -4.96% |
Dividends
BPRF.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
BPRF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than BDIV.TO's 5.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.74% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% |
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 5.91% | 5.78% | 5.72% | 6.02% | 5.71% | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPRF.TO and BDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPRF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BDIV.TO is Global Equity Income.
Find the right allocation for BPRF.TO and BDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer