PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

PR.TO (Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF) and ZPR.TO (BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PR.TO is actively managed, while ZPR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PR.TO returned 5.99%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for ZPR.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR.TO achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than ZPR.TO's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PR.TO has underperformed ZPR.TO with an annualized return of 5.99%, while ZPR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.

PR.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.08%
6M
3.48%
YTD
3.38%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
5.99%

ZPR.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
1.94%
6M
7.55%
YTD
8.16%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PR.TO
Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF		3.38%11.10%24.22%7.90%-18.17%28.22%-0.17%1.64%-10.79%12.24%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF		8.16%18.58%26.58%7.21%-17.66%23.77%6.00%1.94%-9.77%14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PR.TO and ZPR.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between PR.TO and ZPR.TO has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF

BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF

Often compared with ZPR.TO:
ZPR.TO vs. CPD.TOZPR.TO vs. RPF.TOZPR.TO vs. HLPR.TOZPR.TO vs. VDY.TOZPR.TO vs. TPRF.TOZPR.TO vs. HPR.TOZPR.TO vs. SPLT.TO

Return for Risk

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PR.TO
PR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO
ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PR.TOZPR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.29
3.88

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.54
5.87

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.81

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.09

6.76

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.15

38.57

-16.42

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR.TO and ZPR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.17%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPR.TO drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR.TO and ZPR.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PR.TOZPR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.17%

-44.72%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-2.47%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.62%

-8.75%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-23.06%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.17%

-44.13%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-9.21%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.43%

-0.03%

Volatility

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) is 0.79%, while BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that PR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PR.TOZPR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.88%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.69%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

4.30%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.58%

8.32%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

11.42%

+0.10%

Dividends

PR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

PR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, which matches ZPR.TO's 5.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PR.TO
Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF		5.00%4.85%4.49%4.80%4.71%3.85%4.79%4.69%4.97%6.73%3.68%1.17%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF		5.04%4.86%4.93%5.92%5.97%4.66%5.48%5.09%4.82%4.08%5.14%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

PR.TO and ZPR.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Lysander and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR.TO and ZPR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer