PQUS vs. GXLC
PQUS (Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PQUS is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PQUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
PQUS vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PQUS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQUS vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PQUS Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF | 9.18% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQUS and GXLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQUS vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF (PQUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PQUS vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQUS drawdown since its inception was -7.19%, smaller than the maximum GXLC drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQUS and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQUS | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -9.08% | +1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -1.68% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -1.57% | +0.08% |
Volatility
PQUS vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQUS | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 13.70% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 13.70% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 13.70% | +1.24% |
PQUS vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQUS vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
PQUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% |
PQUS Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PQUS and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PQUS.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for PQUS.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for PQUS and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for PQUS and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer