PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQNCX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQNCX achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


PQNCX

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.12%
YTD
13.61%
6M
13.13%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
8.43%

VMFVX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.72%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQNCX
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund
13.61%4.52%2.69%15.19%-13.05%24.95%0.19%28.03%-16.89%25.41%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.01%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PQNCX and VMFVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.92

The correlation between PQNCX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQNCX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQNCX
PQNCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PQNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PQNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQNCXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.99

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

6.85

+0.02

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQNCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQNCX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQNCXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.39

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.48

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.52

+0.04

Drawdowns

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQNCX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQNCX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQNCXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-45.79%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-10.52%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.61%

-22.46%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-22.46%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.52%

-45.79%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.35%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-5.48%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.05%

0.00%

Volatility

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) at 3.87%. This indicates that PQNCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQNCXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.87%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

10.50%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

15.13%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

19.47%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

21.88%

-2.23%

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQNCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQNCX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

PQNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than VMFVX's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQNCX
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund
7.10%8.07%1.99%9.82%39.90%14.94%0.35%10.06%0.01%10.70%0.92%4.54%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.73%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PQNCX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PQNCX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VMFVX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQNCX dropped -59.51% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQNCX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer