PQDI vs. LCAP
PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQDI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while LCAP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Principal. PQDI is passively managed, while LCAP is actively managed. Over the past year, PQDI returned 7.46% vs 28.97% for LCAP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LCAP.
Performance
PQDI vs. LCAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than LCAP's 13.00% return.
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
LCAP
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 28.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQDI vs. LCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.32% | 7.06% |
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 13.00% | 18.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQDI and LCAP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PQDI and LCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
PQDI vs. LCAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQDI
LCAP
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PQDI
LCAP
Communication Services
PQDI
LCAP
Basic Materials
PQDI
-
LCAP
Consumer Cyclical
PQDI
-
LCAP
Consumer Defensive
PQDI
-
LCAP
Energy
PQDI
-
LCAP
Healthcare
PQDI
-
LCAP
Industrials
PQDI
-
LCAP
Real Estate
PQDI
-
LCAP
Technology
PQDI
-
LCAP
Utilities
PQDI
-
LCAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQDI vs. LCAP — Risk / Return Rank
PQDI
LCAP
PQDI vs. LCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQDI | LCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.28 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 3.20 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.40 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.16 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 12.97 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQDI | LCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.28 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.65 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
PQDI vs. LCAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than LCAP's maximum drawdown of -11.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and LCAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQDI | LCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -11.31% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -9.32% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -1.61% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 2.27% | -1.53% |
Volatility
PQDI vs. LCAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 1.16%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQDI | LCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 2.82% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 10.14% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 12.79% | -9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 16.89% | -12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 16.89% | -12.33% |
PQDI vs. LCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LCAP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQDI vs. LCAP - Dividend Comparison
PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than LCAP's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQDI and LCAP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCAP has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to PQDI (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs LCAP's -11.31%.
On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 28.97% vs 7.46% for PQDI. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 28.97% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 0.09% for LCAP.
PQDI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while LCAP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.29% for LCAP.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQDI and LCAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer