PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQDI vs. LCAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQDI vs. LCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than LCAP's 9.75% return.


PQDI

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.47%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*

LCAP

1D
-1.40%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
9.75%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQDI vs. LCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PQDI and LCAP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.65

The correlation between PQDI and LCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQDI vs. LCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQDI
PQDI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQDI vs. LCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQDILCAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.56

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

10.19

-1.58

PQDI vs. LCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the LCAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQDI and LCAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQDI vs. LCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than LCAP's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and LCAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQDILCAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-11.78%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-9.32%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-2.88%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-1.68%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

2.34%

-1.59%

Volatility

PQDI vs. LCAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 0.89%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQDILCAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

4.79%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

10.79%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

13.39%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

16.98%

-12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.54%

16.98%

-12.44%

PQDI vs. LCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LCAP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQDI vs. LCAP - Dividend Comparison

PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than LCAP's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
5.45%5.02%4.93%5.35%5.60%5.21%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQDI and LCAP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAP has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to PQDI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs LCAP's -11.78%.

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 23.78% vs 6.43% for PQDI. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.

PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.

PQDI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while LCAP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.29% for LCAP.

PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQDI and LCAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer