PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQDI vs. FPFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQDI vs. FPFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than FPFD's 0.73% return.


PQDI

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.73%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*

FPFD

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.81%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQDI vs. FPFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
1.19%8.46%9.99%6.24%-9.61%0.96%
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.73%6.46%8.50%10.91%-17.11%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PQDI and FPFD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.72

The correlation between PQDI and FPFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PQDI vs. FPFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PQDI
FPFD

Financial Services

10.5%
16.4%

Communication Services

0.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

5.4%

Financial Services

PQDI
10.5%
FPFD
16.4%

Communication Services

PQDI
0.7%
FPFD
3.5%

Basic Materials

PQDI

-

FPFD

-

Consumer Cyclical

PQDI

-

FPFD
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

PQDI

-

FPFD

-

Energy

PQDI

-

FPFD

-

Healthcare

PQDI

-

FPFD

-

Industrials

PQDI

-

FPFD
0.8%

Real Estate

PQDI

-

FPFD
1.6%

Technology

PQDI

-

FPFD
1.2%

Utilities

PQDI

-

FPFD
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQDI vs. FPFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQDI
PQDI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQDI vs. FPFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQDIFPFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

2.14

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

3.14

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.29

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

8.64

+1.03

PQDI vs. FPFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FPFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQDI and FPFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQDIFPFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.14

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.33

+0.70

Drawdowns

PQDI vs. FPFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum FPFD drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and FPFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQDIFPFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-20.83%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.75%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-4.92%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.23%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-6.82%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.73%

+0.01%

Volatility

PQDI vs. FPFD - Volatility Comparison

Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) at 1.00%. This indicates that PQDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQDIFPFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.00%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.24%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

2.95%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

5.32%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

5.32%

-0.77%

PQDI vs. FPFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQDI vs. FPFD - Dividend Comparison

PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than FPFD's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.15%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%0.00%
PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
5.46%5.02%4.93%5.35%5.60%5.21%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQDI and FPFD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQDI has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs FPFD's -20.83%.

On 3-year performance, PQDI leads with 9.06% vs 7.66% for FPFD. On fees, FPFD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PQDI has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPFD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.

PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 5.15% for FPFD.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.59% for FPFD.

PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQDI and FPFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer