PQDI vs. EVPF
PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PQDI is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.
Performance
PQDI vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
EVPF
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQDI vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 0.27% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQDI and EVPF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQDI vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank
PQDI
EVPF
PQDI vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQDI | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQDI | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.13 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
PQDI vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and EVPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQDI | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -2.36% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.18% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.52% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
PQDI vs. EVPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQDI | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 4.35% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 4.35% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 4.35% | +0.21% |
PQDI vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQDI vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison
PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQDI and EVPF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.
They also come from different issuers: Principal and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.39% for EVPF.
Find the right allocation for PQDI and EVPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer