PQCNX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
PQCNX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 15, 2016. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund | -0.47% | 7.13% | 1.44% | 4.88% | -14.28% | -2.30% | 7.01% | 8.41% | -0.38% | 1.89% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQCNX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.29% return.
PQCNX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQCNX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQCNX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
PQCNX
LSSAX
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQCNX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.61 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 2.49 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 3.41 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 10.00 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQCNX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.61 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.25 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.95 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQCNX and LSSAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
PQCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than LSSAX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund | 3.88% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.13% | 3.13% | 2.71% | 2.66% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQCNX drawdown since its inception was -20.33%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCNX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQCNX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.33% | -16.40% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.45% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | -16.40% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -1.53% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -1.98% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.84% | +0.18% |
Volatility
PQCNX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that PQCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQCNX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.68% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 4.69% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 5.73% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 4.39% | +0.73% |