PQCNX vs. PTRQX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX).
PQCNX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 15, 2016. PTRQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 27, 2010.
Performance
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund | -0.24% | 7.13% | 1.44% | 4.88% | -14.28% | -2.30% | 7.01% | 8.41% | -0.38% | 1.89% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | -0.35% | 7.81% | 3.06% | 7.80% | -14.30% | -1.37% | 8.13% | 10.85% | -0.73% | 6.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQCNX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than PTRQX's -0.35% return.
PQCNX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- —
PTRQX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQCNX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRQX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQCNX vs. PTRQX — Risk / Return Rank
PQCNX
PTRQX
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQCNX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.66 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 4.93 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQCNX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.18 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQCNX and PTRQX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Dividend Comparison
PQCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than PTRQX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund | 3.87% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.13% | 3.13% | 2.71% | 2.66% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.89% | 4.70% | 5.83% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 6.95% | 3.99% | 2.93% | 4.01% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQCNX drawdown since its inception was -20.33%, roughly equal to the maximum PTRQX drawdown of -20.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCNX and PTRQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQCNX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.33% | -20.72% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -3.08% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | -20.69% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -2.35% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -3.31% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 1.04% | -0.01% |
Volatility
PQCNX vs. PTRQX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) at 1.58%. This indicates that PQCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQCNX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 1.58% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.62% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.57% | 4.48% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 5.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 5.22% | -0.10% |