PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQCCX vs. FIIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCCX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than FIIMX's 26.87% return.


PQCCX

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.87%
6M
16.16%
YTD
16.16%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*

FIIMX

1D
-1.33%
1M
4.39%
6M
26.87%
YTD
26.87%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
16.16%7.08%37.16%18.91%-10.54%28.16%3.01%24.76%-15.38%15.48%
FIIMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I
26.87%7.71%17.21%15.01%-14.80%25.26%18.68%23.72%-14.97%20.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCCX and FIIMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PQCCX and FIIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQCCX vs. FIIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCCX
PQCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PQCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PQCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FIIMX
FIIMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQCCXFIIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.03

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

16.13

-6.64

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FIIMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCCX and FIIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, smaller than the maximum FIIMX drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and FIIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQCCXFIIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.27%

-53.22%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-9.83%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.53%

-28.06%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-28.06%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-1.33%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-8.04%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.45%

-0.01%

Volatility

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) is 4.74%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that PQCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQCCXFIIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.12%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

14.38%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

17.82%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.63%

20.43%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.68%

20.95%

+5.73%

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FIIMX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQCCX vs. FIIMX - Dividend Comparison

PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FIIMX's 5.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIIMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I
5.41%6.06%6.79%2.71%5.70%18.41%1.29%3.30%10.56%7.67%4.84%4.76%
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
3.04%3.54%38.85%7.15%17.18%26.66%0.71%1.00%7.37%2.85%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PQCCX and FIIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIIMX has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to PQCCX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs FIIMX's -53.22%.

FIIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQCCX and FIIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer