PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPVIX vs. QRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPVIX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 22.16% return.


PPVIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
10.50%
6M
11.48%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.71%

QRSVX

1D
0.15%
1M
4.61%
YTD
22.16%
6M
21.73%
1Y
36.67%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PPVIX
Principal SmallCap Value Fund II
10.50%8.18%16.09%20.00%-9.20%32.00%3.05%
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
22.16%13.37%10.72%16.04%-9.14%23.16%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PPVIX and QRSVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020

0.93

The correlation between PPVIX and QRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPVIX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPVIX
PPVIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PPVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PPVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QRSVX
QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPVIXQRSVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.39

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.56

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.47

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.79

15.86

-5.07

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPVIX and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPVIXQRSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.39

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.64

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.80

-0.42

Drawdowns

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPVIX drawdown since its inception was -64.79%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPVIX and QRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPVIXQRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.79%

-20.59%

-44.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-7.93%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.89%

-18.91%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-20.59%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.38%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-4.90%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.23%

+0.44%

Volatility

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX) is 3.70%, while FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that PPVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPVIXQRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.06%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

10.23%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

15.06%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.12%

17.45%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

17.47%

+5.17%

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPVIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPVIX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

PPVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than QRSVX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPVIX
Principal SmallCap Value Fund II
8.04%8.88%20.81%3.11%11.81%15.05%0.76%0.88%26.50%6.37%5.98%11.97%
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
3.64%4.45%4.86%2.56%2.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPVIX and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRSVX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to PPVIX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPVIX dropped -64.79% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPVIX and QRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer