PPRMX vs. EKBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PPRMX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX).
PPRMX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 30, 2011. EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.81% | 16.58% | 12.47% | 6.37% | -5.22% | 13.72% | 9.32% | 11.25% | -3.76% | 8.38% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 4.55% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPRMX achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PPRMX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 7.54%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.
PPRMX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
EKBAX
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPRMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PPRMX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
PPRMX
EKBAX
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PPRMX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPRMX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 1.80 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.37 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.64 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 12.94 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPRMX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.80 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.78 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 0.80 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between PPRMX and EKBAX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
PPRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than EKBAX's 9.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.45% | 2.52% | 9.77% | 0.00% | 14.01% | 11.20% | 0.76% | 3.11% | 11.35% | 6.36% | 0.45% | 3.01% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 9.20% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPRMX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPRMX and EKBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPRMX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -55.64% | +36.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -13.29% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.36% | -24.84% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.20% | -32.33% | +14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -7.32% | +4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -8.03% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.71% | -1.62% |
Volatility
PPRMX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PPRMX) is 2.29%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that PPRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PPRMX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 5.70% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 12.79% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 20.75% | -13.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 17.86% | -9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 17.40% | -9.87% |