PPLT vs. XLV
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPLT returned 5.17%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
PPLT vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -16.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 5.17%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
PPLT vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -16.64% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and XLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
XLV
PPLT vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.38 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 3.31 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -39.17% | -31.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.02% | -10.47% | -29.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.02% | -17.11% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.02% | -17.11% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -28.40% | -22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -3.59% | -34.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -7.12% | -32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.37% | 4.37% | +13.00% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.90%. This indicates that PPLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 4.90% | +6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 10.60% | +34.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.99% | 15.03% | +35.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 14.75% | +17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 16.58% | +12.52% |
PPLT vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and XLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPLT has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.81% vs 5.17% for PPLT. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. PPLT tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer