PPLT vs. U-U.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO).

PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010.

Performance

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF	-4.29%	124.48%	-8.90%	-8.18%	10.43%	-9.80%
U-U.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	2.33%	18.19%	-25.24%	86.20%	-0.84%	22.66%

Different Trading Currencies

PPLT is traded in USD, while U-U.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the U-U.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than U-U.TO's 2.33% return.

PPLT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -14.94%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: 25.60%
• 1Y: 98.09%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

U-U.TO

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -5.20%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PPLT vs. U-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLT

PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 84
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

U-U.TO

U-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
U-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
U-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
U-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
U-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPLT	U-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.06	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.63	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	1.94	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.31	4.70	+3.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLT and U-U.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPLT	U-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	1.06	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.37	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between PPLT and U-U.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PPLT nor U-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than U-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and U-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPLT	U-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.73%	-48.74%	-21.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.41%	-22.78%	-11.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.26%	-19.53%	-9.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.08%	-21.93%	-18.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	9.43%	+2.04%

Volatility

PPLT vs. U-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a higher volatility of 13.24% compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) at 11.24%. This indicates that PPLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than U-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPLT	U-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.24%	11.24%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.59%	28.16%	+16.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.12%	41.19%	+7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.02%	45.00%	-12.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.72%	45.00%	-16.28%