PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLT vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -19.76% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's -5.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed SGDJ with an annualized return of 4.70%, while SGDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.


PPLT

1D
-1.45%
1M
-14.37%
YTD
-19.76%
6M
-28.09%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
4.70%

SGDJ

1D
-5.01%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
72.25%
3Y*
50.80%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLT
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
-19.76%124.48%-8.90%-8.18%10.43%-10.75%10.78%20.85%-14.95%2.38%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.38%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLT and SGDJ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.56

The correlation between PPLT and SGDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (10 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLT vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLT
PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPLTSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.97

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

5.11

-3.63

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLT and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than SGDJ's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLTSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-59.27%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.69%

-36.84%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.69%

-36.84%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.69%

-52.66%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.14%

-59.27%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.69%

-31.02%

-9.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.93%

-26.25%

-13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.34%

14.18%

+4.16%

Volatility

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 11.41%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLTSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

18.68%

-7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.28%

42.77%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.70%

50.78%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.68%

40.87%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.18%

40.96%

-11.78%

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPLT vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLT
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.85%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPLT and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to PPLT (11.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 10.08% vs 4.70% for PPLT. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PPLT has been the lower-risk option at 11.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.85%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.

PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGDJ is Gold. PPLT tracks LBMA Platinum Price PM, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLT and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer