PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLT vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLT vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than IGLD's 1.69% return.


PPLT

1D
-3.71%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
-9.46%
6M
11.32%
1Y
71.46%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
5.97%

IGLD

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
1.69%
6M
4.44%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLT vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PPLT
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
-9.46%124.48%-8.90%-8.18%10.43%-18.28%
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
1.69%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLT and IGLD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.53

The correlation between PPLT and IGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLT vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLT
PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLT vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLTIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.40

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

3.82

+0.59

PPLT vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLT and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLTIGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.06

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.86

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.94

-0.92

Drawdowns

PPLT vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLTIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-18.59%

-52.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-17.56%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.41%

-17.56%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-18.59%

-15.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.08%

-15.16%

-17.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.95%

-5.24%

-34.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.24%

6.43%

+9.81%

Volatility

PPLT vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that PPLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLTIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

5.12%

+6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.68%

21.01%

+23.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.72%

23.24%

+27.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.49%

15.17%

+17.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.00%

15.00%

+14.00%

PPLT vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPLT vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
17.92%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
PPLT
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPLT and IGLD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPLT has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to IGLD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs IGLD's -18.59%.

On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 13.02% vs 9.07% for PPLT. On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.

They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.85% for IGLD.

PPLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLT and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer