PPLT vs. GLDM
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PPLT returned 9.07%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
PPLT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 71.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PPLT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -9.46% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -8.76% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and GLDM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between PPLT and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
GLDM
PPLT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPLT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.70 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 4.23 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPLT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.04 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.02 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -21.63% | -49.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -19.14% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.41% | -19.14% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -20.92% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.08% | -17.65% | -15.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.95% | -6.22% | -33.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.24% | 7.69% | +8.55% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that PPLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 5.47% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.68% | 22.99% | +21.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.72% | 26.39% | +24.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.49% | 17.91% | +14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 16.85% | +12.15% |
PPLT vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and GLDM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPLT has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 9.07% for PPLT. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.
PPLT and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDM is Gold. PPLT tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.10% for GLDM.
PPLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer