PPLT vs. COPX
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPLT returned 5.17%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for COPX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
PPLT vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -16.64% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 5.17%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.86% annualized return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 106.27%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
PPLT vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -16.64% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and COPX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.47 |
The correlation between PPLT and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
COPX
PPLT vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 3.75 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 11.60 | -9.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -83.16% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.02% | -27.82% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.02% | -39.72% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.02% | -42.12% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -65.41% | +14.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -10.17% | -28.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -39.28% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.37% | 8.98% | +8.39% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 11.07%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 19.30% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 38.15% | +7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.99% | 43.66% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 37.00% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 35.75% | -6.65% |
PPLT vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and COPX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to PPLT (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.86% vs 5.17% for PPLT. On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PPLT has been the lower-risk option at 11.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while COPX is Copper. PPLT tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer