PPLT vs. BAMU
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. PPLT is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, PPLT returned 71.23% vs 2.95% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
PPLT vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.08% return.
PPLT
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 71.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPLT vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -7.69% | 124.48% | -8.90% | 11.02% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.08% | 3.21% | 4.14% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and BAMU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
BAMU
PPLT vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPLT | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.42 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 25.06 | -22.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 98.57 | -94.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPLT | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 5.01 | -3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 4.15 | -4.13 |
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -0.36% | -70.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -0.12% | -34.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.77% | 0.00% | -31.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.95% | -0.02% | -39.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.36% | 0.03% | +16.33% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that PPLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 0.07% | +11.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.70% | 0.43% | +44.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.74% | 0.59% | +50.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 0.87% | +31.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 0.87% | +28.13% |
PPLT vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.06% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and BAMU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPLT has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs BAMU's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, PPLT leads with 71.23% vs 2.95% for BAMU. On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PPLT has performed better with a 71.23% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer