PPIE vs. SMH
PPIE (Putnam Panagora ESG International Equity ETF -) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. PPIE is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPIE returned 18.32%/yr vs 64.17%/yr for SMH. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPIE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
PPIE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPIE achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
PPIE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
PPIE vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PPIE Putnam Panagora ESG International Equity ETF - | 8.26% | 32.77% | 7.67% | 9.66% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 54.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPIE and SMH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PPIE and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
PPIE vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPIE
SMH
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PPIE
SMH
-
Industrials
PPIE
SMH
-
Technology
PPIE
SMH
Healthcare
PPIE
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
PPIE
SMH
-
Basic Materials
PPIE
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPIE
SMH
-
Communication Services
PPIE
SMH
-
Energy
PPIE
SMH
-
Utilities
PPIE
SMH
-
Real Estate
PPIE
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPIE vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
PPIE
SMH
PPIE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Panagora ESG International Equity ETF - (PPIE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPIE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.72 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 10.59 | -8.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 40.63 | -34.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPIE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 5.19 | -3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.34 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
PPIE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPIE drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPIE and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPIE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -84.96% | +71.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -14.93% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -35.74% | +22.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -41.09% | +38.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.89% | -0.65% |
Volatility
PPIE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Panagora ESG International Equity ETF - (PPIE) is 4.18%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that PPIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPIE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 11.47% | -7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 24.29% | -11.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 30.56% | -15.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 35.01% | -20.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 32.57% | -17.74% |
PPIE vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPIE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPIE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
PPIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPIE Putnam Panagora ESG International Equity ETF - | 12.07% | 8.40% | 5.12% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPIE and SMH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to PPIE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPIE dropped -13.55% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 64.17% vs 18.32% for PPIE. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PPIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 64.17% return vs 18.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PPIE.
PPIE has the higher dividend yield at 12.07%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
PPIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PPIE and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPIE and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer