PPI vs. MAPP
PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PPI returned 38.26% vs 21.23% for MAPP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for MAPP.
Performance
PPI vs. MAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than MAPP's 7.25% return.
PPI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 38.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAPP
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 21.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPI vs. MAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 16.52% | 30.05% | 6.43% | 4.85% |
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 7.25% | 18.67% | 14.25% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPI and MAPP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PPI and MAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
PPI vs. MAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPI
MAPP
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
PPI
MAPP
Energy
PPI
MAPP
Utilities
PPI
MAPP
Real Estate
PPI
MAPP
Basic Materials
PPI
MAPP
Consumer Cyclical
PPI
MAPP
Technology
PPI
MAPP
Communication Services
PPI
-
MAPP
Consumer Defensive
PPI
-
MAPP
Financial Services
PPI
-
MAPP
Healthcare
PPI
-
MAPP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPI vs. MAPP — Risk / Return Rank
PPI
MAPP
PPI vs. MAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPI | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | 3.45 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 13.70 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPI | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.39 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.53 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
PPI vs. MAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than MAPP's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and MAPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPI | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -12.92% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -6.17% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -0.65% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -1.38% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.55% | +0.89% |
Volatility
PPI vs. MAPP - Volatility Comparison
Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) at 2.98%. This indicates that PPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPI | MAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 2.98% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 7.07% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 8.94% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 10.75% | +8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 10.75% | +8.29% |
PPI vs. MAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPP's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPI vs. MAPP - Dividend Comparison
PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than MAPP's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 2.76% | 2.96% | 2.41% | 2.78% | 0.00% |
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.60% | 2.87% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPI and MAPP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPI has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to MAPP (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs MAPP's -12.92%.
On 1-year performance, PPI leads with 38.26% vs 21.23% for MAPP. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MAPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PPI has performed better with a 38.26% return vs 21.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.
MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 0.92% for MAPP.
PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPI and MAPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer